TEN KEY POINTS FROM YORK THEATRE ROYAL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TOM BIRD’S BBC RADIO YORK INTERVIEW WITH ADAM TOMLINSON THIS AFTERNOON
1. A new writer and director, with a new direction, will be appointed to make a “spectacular, fabulous, really York” Theatre Royal pantomime for 2020-2021.
2. Yes, it will still be a pantomime, not a winter show.
3. No, Berwick Kaler will not be involved as writer, co-director or dame.
4. Audience figures have declined for 11 years, from as high as 54,190 for Dick Turpin in 2008 to 30,000 so far (with two weeks to go) for Sleeping Beauty. Those “collapsing” figures have to be checked and reversed by attracting a new audience as well as retaining the regular theatregoers.
5. The current contract practice with the regular players, David Leonard, Suzy Cooper, Martin Barrass and A J Powell, is an unspoken agreement of a return for the next show, but Mr Bird wanted to be clear with those performers that this time this would not be the case. No-one is guaranteed an automatic contract renewal and no-one is on a long contract.
6. No regrets at the “halfway house” of retaining retired dame Berwick Kaler as writer and co-director for Sleeping Beauty as a chance to showcase the talents of the “amazing” cast regulars in a way audiences had not seen before, and “to some extent” this had happened. However, from ticket launch day onwards, some people had said ‘No, I’m not going to go.”
7. Refuting Berwick Kaler’s charges of “cheap sets, cheap costumes” for Sleeping Beauty, Mr Bird said the overall pantomime budget had increased. The designer [Anthony Lamble] was new, but the set and costume expenditure was the same as it was for The Grand Old Dame Of York last winter.
8. The new director and writer will need to have free rein for next winter’s pantomime, and if they were told they had to have certain actors, that would not be free rein. It should be a free shot, a state of autonomy, without any ties restricting them.
9. Could there be a U-turn, given that 1,400 people have signed an online petition to bring back Berwick? No.
Berwick had created something extraordinary over 40 years, but this is how life works: the panto needs a re-boot, one where “you don’t have to be in the club to come”.
10. The 2020-2021 pantomime will be announced at a launch on February 3.
“Things have not gone well and it’s not the fault
of the cast. The sets do not do what the script requires.” Dame Berwick Kaler,
The Press, York, January 9.
IT should not have come to this, and yet it was
inevitable. Berwick Kaler told the full house on the last night of his 40-year
damehood on February 2 last year that he would be “back like a shot” if the
Theatre Royal came a’calling.
Now, in a move without consultation with those above him to match the Duke and Duchess of Sussex in the very same week, and always a law unto himself, he has used the pages of The Press newspaper to tell the Theatre Royal to “take me back”, backed by long-serving principal girl Suzy Cooper.
“I made the biggest mistake saying I
was going to retire,” said Dame Berwick. “I want to jump out of my suit and
perform.”
Let’s remember that the dame called
time; he was not pushed into retirement, and a 40th anniversary
show gave Britain’s longest-serving dame a right royal and loyal send-off in
The Grand Old Dame Of York.
Fully fit after his double heart
bypass, Dame Berwick has “retired” but, unlike Elvis, not left the building, writing the script for
Sleeping Beauty and co-directing the show with Matt Aston, purveyor of the past
three rock’n’roll pantomimes at Leeds City Varieties Music Hall in Leeds.
Like the dame, many a boxer later
decides he has made a mistake by retiring, but then makes a bigger one by
returning, having lost his punch or, in Berwick’s case, his punchlines.
The splash story in The Press amounts
to an act of mutiny by Berwick Kaler and Suzy Cooper, openly taking on the
management and the board with a series of criticisms that have been refuted
swiftly by executive director Tom Bird. In doing so, they are in essence saying
“Back us or sack us” and calling on the public, “our audience”, to support
their case.
Berwick may have been in for a shock
when The Press’s invitation to Have Your Say on whether he should be back on
stage next winter evoked such responses as: “No. Big ego.” “Time for completely
new blood.” “Time to move on, Berwick”. “Definitely not.” “Stay retired
Berwick. The pantomime has run its course.” Or, in the words of Farmer Tom:
“Time to have a completely fresh start. The Kaler days were legendary but
they’re gone. New blood needed.”
What the Kaler-Cooper outburst has
done is bring the debate out into the open, just as was the intention of the
headline in the charleshutchpress.co.uk review:
“Sleeping Beauty awakes at York Theatre Royal but should Dame Berwick era
be put to bed?”
At the request of the rest of the “Not
Famous But Famous Five in York”, David Leonard, Suzy Cooper, Martin Barrass and
AJ Powell, Berwick was taken on once more as writer and co-director, also
appearing in the brace of films and voicing, aptly, a skeleton. The effect,
however, was like Banquo’s Ghost haunting this halfway house of a show.
And now, within the bubble of self-preservation, Berwick wants to be back, Suzy wants him back. However, while a bad workman blames his tools, as the saying goes, this particular workman, Berwick, blamed someone else’s tools – the “cheap sets and cheap costumes” – for “things not going well” for Sleeping Beauty. It is true Anthony Lamble’s designs did not match the spectacular heights of predecessor Mark Walters, but that slur is a cheap, inaccurate shot, and although he is right that Sleeping Beauty’s failings are “not the fault of the cast”, what of his own tools as writer and co-director?
Berwick is deluded in believing the
script was not at fault either, and it is no secret that the new, experimental Aston-Kaler
directorial partnership did not gel, alas.
Where does York Theatre Royal go
next? Bird and board cannot answer only to the needs and wishes of Berwick,
Suzy and their “loyal audience”. There is a wider audience to consider; those
who do not go to a Dame Berwick pantomime, but would like to see in this new
decade with a new beginning for the Theatre Royal’s winter show.
In particular, a show for the next generation of theatre-goers, children, who are noticeably outnumbered by adults at the Kaler brand of chaotic meta-panto, in contrast to the audience profile of pantomimes across the country.
The CharlesHutchPress review of Sleeping Beauty on December 12 ended by pondering the Theatre Royal’s vision for 2020. “Are the days of this brand of pantomime behind you?”, it asked, “because the patented but weary “same old rubbish” won’t suffice next year.
“This is no
laughing matter, and here are the options,” it went on. “Bring back Dame
Berwick full on, working from the inside, not the outside, with all that goes
with that; or freshen up the panto in a different way, or find a new vehicle to
utilise the talents of Leonard, Cooper, Barrass and Powell. Many a theatre has
moved on from pantomime, whether Leeds Playhouse, the Stephen Joseph Theatre or
Hull Truck, and still found a winter winner. We await the Bird call…”.
The future of the Kaler pantomime is uncertain, says Suzy, who
fears the axe, but the future of pantomime at York Theatre Royal is not
uncertain. Will the Theatre Royal “take Berwick back” into the panto fold on
stage? No. No player is bigger than the club, as the football world is fond of
saying, and to continue the football analogy, Berwick and Suzy have scored an own
goal in going to The Press.
If Berwick, now 73, really does want to “jump out of my suit and
perform”, then how about doing so in plays for the veteran stage of acting:
Lear in King Lear, Prospero in The Tempest or Sir in Ronald Harwood’s The
Dresser with Martin Barrass as his Norman?
Come early February, we shall know the answer to the pantomime conundrum. Is it too outrageous to suggest that if it came to a choice between who is now more invaluable to the Theatre Royal panto, it would be the villainous David Leonard, not the mutinous Dame Berwick?